It appears I struck a nerve when offering to people that they could submit their own pet theories on the Voynichthoughts site, since I seem to be getting contributions on an almost daily basis.
Today, it was a submission by “Daniel” who, after a friendly enough introduction —
thank you for your blog. I am neither an expert nor a scientist but I curiously look up on whats new to Voynich once in a while. Thank you for giving me the chance to address some questions to the community, that came to my mind. Feel free to publish or not publish any or parts of it.
proceeded with, rather than presenting his own suggestions, a kind of questionnaire regarding the VM.
Since I find all of these questions very intelligent and thoughtful, here they are for you, in the hope of a lively discusson. To avoid getting the individual threads hopelessly entangled, I’ve decided to post Daniel’s questions individually. (I will join in the fray as soon as I find the time!)
- Information hiding
- Language, music, numbers
- Jürgen Hermes
- “Solitary” ciphers
- Editorial structure
- Lonely language
(By the way, with these posts Voynichthoughts will break the mark of 100 messages, wohoo!)
8. Has there ever been an example in history, a single human has developed an own form of writing down thoughts/information due to a lack of understanding surrounding language or a mother tongue e.g. due to some disability?
7. Has the editorial structure, in what ways it is present and in what ways it isn’t, been discussed somewhere?
6. Are there different attributes to encryption techniques when one encrypts something for him/herself opposed to cyphers for someone else to decode?
6.1 If the VM is only meant to be read by the authorship, does this suggest a decryption to be more difficult or impossible?
6.2 Is there any idea, if the VM is meant to travel rather than to be stored?
6.3 When the VM is created for some group, e.g. offspring, heirs or successors, how would an decryption technique and/or key be stored apart but still accessible?
5. Has the gender of the authorship been discussed?
5.1 Could the drawings be the work of some male nerdy adolescent digesting pubertal sexual phantasies? Or could they even be the work of a female, expressing everyday life?
5.2 How common was female nudity in 15th century Europe? Was bathing done in groups rather than in private?
5.3 What do we know about shame regarding nudity in the 15th century?
4. Has the thesis of Jürgen Hermes been discussed in the English speaking community?
3. If the “font” has been used to make it appear to a hostile party as some foreign natural language one would not be able to understand anyway, would it be probable, that the drawings also have a stenographic [sic] purpose to make the MV appear somehow unimportant/harmless?
— Daniel, I suppose you meant “steganography” (“hidden” messages) rather than “stenography” (shorthand?)